up a level
post article
search
admin
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Completing the Revolution
by Scott Bakker on Friday March 14, @08:35AM
|
| We're pretty much of one mind then. My hunch is that semantics will always elude functional explanation, which is to say, always elude science. I look forward to discussing this at Ad Astra!
But I'm not sure your 'triviality' argument (that the 'semantic dilemma' is simply the cost of doing science) against my complaint has much bite. The dilemma is particularly piquant in cognitive science, where many, and certainly all of the most interesting, explananda, involve the intentional phenomena of experience. Certainly this alters the stakes - and stability - of Lakoff's claim, no? |
| Post Reply |
Important Stuff:
Note: Fields with bold titles are required.
Please try to keep posts on topic.
Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads,
Read other people's messages before posting your own to
avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
Use a clear subject that describes what your
message is about.
Please do not post offtopic, inflammatory, inappropriate, illegal,
or offensive comments. Repeat offenders will be sanctioned.
|